so what happened is a few liberals decided that bush's wiretapping and nixon's wiretapping are the same. i made the comment that if they wanted to compare the DNC to terrorrists that i thought it was a stretch, but funny and go ahead. well, some limp brained commentor took offense and said i was less of a person for making that comparison.
look, i shouldn't blog before coffee, i'll give you that. i've made the mistake before. but here is what i was going for: bush is wiretapping terrorrists as nixon wiretapped the DNC. see, terrorists=dnc, funny comparison, no? hello? stop saying that nixon and bush are acting the same if you don't want us to draw the natural conclusion. there is no comparison.
anyways, this is a much better post than anything i've written so please do click the link and get over to jack's and read declare yourself. i'm trying to stay out of the comments until the java gels a coherent thought. and since i already got attacked once, i thought it more respectful of jack's comments to take it home with me and chew on it here, and you know what? i'm still right--stupid fucking comparison, liberals!!
a man in uniform, i think he's worthy of a blown-eyed bodgeroll. big changes coming to the chou chope in the near future. and innana, if you come by again, i knew there was good meaning in that analogy, i just didn't get it. dissent is american--two parties, one hangover. thanks for the drive by and you take it nice and beady, ya hear?
ya'll take it easy.
Posted by shoe at February 2, 2006 07:36 AM | TrackBack